On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 07:34:53PM -0500, J D Falk wrote:
On 30/12/2008 11:15, "Dave CROCKER" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
> The fact that i= is defined to identify a user, rather than a mailbox,
and
A user, or a use! But I doubt that makes things any clearer.
I thought i= was just an identity. It could have any of these
properties:
1) is a valid domain when it is the same as d=
2) could be a sub-domain of d= and might not even exist
3) could look like an address/mailbox (with 1 & 2) but that mailbox
doesn't have to exist
So it should be treated opaquely as it could really represent anything.
--
Jeff Macdonald
jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html