ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Next steps for draft-ietf-dkim-ssp

2009-01-06 18:29:44
John L wrote:
That would be fine with me, but what it says now is that the i= MUST match
the From: address.  As I've said a few times, that's clearly wrong, but I
got shouted down in the past when I tried to change it.
      
Without getting into the merits of the argument (and I don't think we
should do all that again), the document does currently reflect the
WG's rough consensus so let's keep this to adding clarifications as
Pasi requested and not try re-open issues now after the end of IETF
LC.
    

Since I don't understand what the people who want to use i= think it's 
supposed to do, I'll defer to the other authors and them them fix it this 
time around.
  

Sure, I'd be willing to write some text about this.  I don't want to reopen the can of worms by changing the semantics of the document at this late stage.

-Jim
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html