Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:23 AM, John Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Now let's see if we can clarify once and for all that d= is the
identifier, and i= only means what the signer wants it to mean, so you
can only interpret it to the extent you recognize the signer.
Good. Can the errata document that seeks to clarify SDID v/s UAID
please, please drive this point home? With enough MUST NOT BE ASSUMED
type wording?
Sure...
Please suggest specific text to add/change in the draft Errata.
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html