ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] summarizing my understanding of the errata discussion & a proposal

2009-02-05 11:43:54
Douglas Otis wrote:

This new function called the Identity Assessor for DKIM would  
presumably be focused on identities.  For DKIM, it might determine  
which portion of an email-address gets highlighted.

When the i= field _exactly_ matches with an email-address contained  
within a signed header field, this entire email-address could be  
safely highlighted.

And what if it doesn't match, do you color it Grey? Not color it all?

What happens after inevitable failure is par course, no highlights. 
Should the user be worry? Of eventually ignore it, thus putting the 
user an unsafe harbor with those that are highlighted?

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>