Eliot Lear wrote:
It is common for Errata to provide precise corrections. That means
supplying
the exact text that needs to be changed. While a generic "warning" is
comforting, it is not precise.
While I am very much amenable to a different set of text, I do not
accept your characterization of the above text as a generic warning.
The warning is actually quite specific.
RFC4871 is a body of specific text. Either one publishes replacements for its
text or one publishes a rule that can be used for replacing text. The current
Errata draft does the former. You want to do the latter.
The latter invites one reader to apply the rule differently than another
reader.
The former does not.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html