ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-fenton-dkim-reputation-hint-00]

2009-02-19 13:45:37
Douglas Otis wrote:
On Feb 18, 2009, at 3:11 PM, John Levine wrote:

...

When the d= value can not be associated with an email-address domain  
(where even parent domains would also be excluded), it would represent  
a third-party signature.  When the i= value can not be associated with  
that of an email-address, there should be no expectations that it  
references a valid destination.  It seems both inaccurate and counter  
productive to describe the d= value as ever being opaque, and it seems  
safe to do so for the i= value only when not associated with other  
email-addresses within the message.  Please do not overlook the  
intended goal established for DKIM so soon.

+1.

-- 
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html