Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY"

Any way to tell someone its signature is used in third party signing?


No.  See the list archives where this issue was beaten to death
several times.

Remember that invalid signatures are ignored, and signers are already
aware of all the valid signatures they've applied.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Franck Martin Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Franck Martin Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", John Levine <= Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] broken signature is no signature, was NO DKIM "POLICY", John Levine Message not available [ietf-dkim] Fwd: broken signature is no signature, was NO DKIM "POLICY", HLS Re: [ietf-dkim] broken signature is no signature, was NO DKIM "POLICY", Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond Re: [ietf-dkim] broken signature is no signature, was NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Franck Martin Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] NO DKIM "POLICY", Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]