ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization

2009-03-09 23:42:56
As I understand it, that's broken.  Carriage returns / linefeeds fine.
 Form feeds, vertical tabs?

--srs

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:00 AM, deiva shanmugam
<chittushanmugam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi,

   Can anyone please let me know, if control characters like vertical tab,
Form feed, page eject etc are available in the header, what has to be done,
when relaxed canonicalization for the headers is followed?

Example:

Content-Type:^Lmultipart/alternative;^Kboundary=^M"----=_NextPart_000_0000_JLZRZLJO.OULDWYUC"

Thanks,
Deiva Shanmugam


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html