Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque

2009-03-25 21:57:59

+1 from me.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Dave CROCKER <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> 
wrote:

   The latest text (both Levine's and mine) move that aspect of the text back
to where it was.

   Again:  No change in the definition of AUID (i=) was intended and I am
/very/ sorry for that bit of sloppiness.


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), (continued) Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Douglas Otis Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Suresh Ramasubramanian Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, John Levine Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Wietse Venema Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Michael Adkins Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Suresh Ramasubramanian <= Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Charles Lindsey Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Suresh Ramasubramanian
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Charles Lindsey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]