+1
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 07:28:15AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I'd probably say 'freudian slip' for that. And +1 for text with
Ellen's change below.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Siegel, Ellen
<esiegel(_at_)constantcontact(_dot_)com> wrote:
Can you explain why you used "dedicated to the assessment of the delivered
name" rather than "... of the delivered identifier"? I can live with it
either way, but it seems strange to say that it consumes an identifier but
assesses a name.
Aside from that, it looks fine to me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
--
Jeff Macdonald
jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html