Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine

2009-03-27 18:26:09

Jim Fenton wrote:

+1 with Ellen's change.


+1

-- 
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Siegel, Ellen Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Suresh Ramasubramanian Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Al Iverson Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Jeff Macdonald Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Jim Fenton Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, J.D. Falk <= Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Eliot Lear

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, J.D. Falk
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), J.D. Falk
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Barry Leiba
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]