On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
We could say "DNS-resolvable".
We could, but it's not actually a requirement that the SDID resolve in
the DNS (and in many cases it won't).
I think "domain name" is just vague enough to avoid these problems. If
you try and make it more specific without making it misleading, it's
going to take more than just a couple of words to describe accurately.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html