ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] chained signatures, was l= summary

2009-06-02 07:14:07
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:49:28 +0100, Barry Leiba 
<barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org>  
wrote:

I think it's a terrible idea to (1) leave signatures in a message
after you break them, (2) add A-R without removing any already there,
or (3) add A-R without a signature covering it.

And I, on the contrary, believe it is a terrible idea EVER to remove a  
signature or an A-R header. There is never anything to be gained by  
throwing away information that someone more perceptive than yourself might  
find useful.

-- 
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131                       
   Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk      Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9      Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html