Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

ietf-dkim

Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

2009-06-11 12:00:57

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 5:18 PM, <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com> wrote:

 Remove unused features? Sure, adsp


+1 for rm -rf adsp

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Suresh Ramasubramanian <= Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Barry Leiba Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, SM Message not available Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Steve Atkins Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Dave CROCKER Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Eliot Lear Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Bill.Oxley Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Michael Thomas Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Douglas Otis

Previous by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Bill.Oxley
Next by Date:	Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Stephen Farrell
Previous by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Bill.Oxley
Next by Thread:	Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?, Barry Leiba
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]