ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

2009-06-12 13:51:01
Okay, I would like to keep what we have, removing pieces is not a good idea, 
people don't have to use the tags if they don't want to and we MAY have a need 
for them in the future. The tags were discussed at length during the original 
draft. Removing them after the fact doesn't help or hurt adoption rates.

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 3:46 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Why bother removing features?

Come on, people: stop being snarky.
Dave asked a legitimate question about the DKIM base spec, which has
been Proposed Standard for two years now, and which we're considering
progressing to Draft Standard.

Whether you like ADSP or not, it isn't part of this.

Barry
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html