Charles Lindsey wrote:
So there remain only two things he did _not_ do, which he might have done:
-7. His signature did NOT cover the A-R he had added (so we have to assume
that it was not an artefact by the spammer, although it most certainly
SHOULD have been removed if it was). So we may well "believe" the list
manager had put it there, but it would be nicer to have had some proof.
+1, I think it makes sense to bind the A-R recording of a stripped
original signature.
-8. The list manager did not retain the original (and now broken) original
signature. Tnere are certainly some on this list who would have preferred
to see it left ("for forensics").
Or changed to X-DKIM-Signature and bind this also in the new signature.
--
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html