ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!

2009-10-19 10:32:22


--On 17 October 2009 17:57:30 +0000 John Levine <johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

But whatever, we may need a straw poll followed by a clarification RFC,
to settle once and for all whether Levine or Thomas is canon.

Mike's version is what the RFC says.  My version is the way that way
too many people will misunderstand it, no matter what it actually
says.

Then it needs explicit clarification in implementation guides. I think that 
what the RFCs say is good. It's enough to give real benefit to recipients, 
whereas the misinterpretation will make ADSP practically unusable (as if 
only "discardable" existed).

You've illustrated my point very well.  Thanks!

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html



-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html