IETF DKIM (date)
October 31, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Dave CROCKER, 20:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Doug Otis, 16:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Interesting Dupe Signatures, hector, 16:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 15:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, ned+dkim, 15:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Interesting Dupe Signatures, hector, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Interesting Dupe Signatures, Michael Thomas, 14:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Interesting Dupe Signatures, Steve Atkins, 13:59
- [ietf-dkim] Interesting Dupe Signatures, hector, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, John R. Levine, 13:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 09:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 08:46
October 30, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Doug Otis, 20:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 18:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Dave CROCKER, 17:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Doug Otis, 17:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, John R. Levine, 16:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 15:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Eliot Lear, 14:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 14:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Steve Atkins, 14:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, John Levine, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Doug Otis, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Eliot Lear, 10:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Ian Eiloart, 06:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 02:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, John Levine, 02:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, John Levine, 01:52
October 29, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Mark Delany, 21:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 19:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Dave CROCKER, 18:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Michael Thomas, 16:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Ian Eiloart, 15:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Ian Eiloart, 15:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, O'Reirdan, Michael, 14:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Ian Eiloart, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Steve Atkins, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Mark Delany, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Douglas Otis, 13:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Dave CROCKER, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, SM, 12:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 11:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Dave CROCKER, 09:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, hector, 08:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM on envelope level, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 06:00
October 26, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 20:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Dave CROCKER, 16:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-09.txt, Barry Leiba, 16:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, John Levine, 15:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domains with ADSP, J.D. Falk, 13:54
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-09.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 07:34
October 24, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Scott Kitterman, 23:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Franck Martin, 20:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 19:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 19:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 18:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 18:18
October 23, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Scott Kitterman, 22:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 22:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Michael Thomas, 20:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Jim Fenton, 20:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Dave CROCKER, 20:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Franck Martin, 20:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Dave CROCKER, 19:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Jim Fenton, 19:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domains with ADSP, Franck Martin, 19:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domains with ADSP, J.D. Falk, 17:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 11:49
October 20, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label updated, Doug Otis, 19:41
- [ietf-dkim] OT: Two calls for papers that may of of interest to this group, Barry Leiba, 13:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] domains with ADSP, hector, 06:51
- [ietf-dkim] domains with ADSP, Franck Martin, 02:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 01:22
October 19, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, John Levine, 23:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, John Levine, 23:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, SM, 20:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal, Scott Kitterman, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Dave CROCKER, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, hector, 14:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 14:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 13:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Barry Leiba, 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 13:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, Barry Leiba, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 13:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Refocusing on the re-charter, Barry Leiba, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Michael Thomas, 12:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Refocusing on the re-charter, Michael Deutschmann, 11:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 10:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, Ian Eiloart, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 10:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 10:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 07:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 04:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Daniel Black, 00:27
October 18, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Daniel Black, 23:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, John R. Levine, 23:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Daniel Black, 22:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Barry Leiba, 22:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Dave CROCKER, 21:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, John Levine, 21:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Barry Leiba, 20:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 20:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 18:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 18:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 18:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Refocusing on the re-charter, Barry Leiba, 18:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Scott Kitterman, 17:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How about that DKIM charter update proposal, John Levine, 16:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 14:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Stephen Farrell, 14:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, SM, 14:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Refocusing on the re-charter, Michael Deutschmann, 12:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 11:57
- [ietf-dkim] Refocusing on the re-charter, Barry Leiba, 11:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, Michael Thomas, 09:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Michael Deutschmann, 09:01
October 17, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, hector, 23:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, hector, 19:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, it's' both!, John Levine, 14:01
- [ietf-dkim] Thomas Interpretation vs. Levine Interpretation, Michael Deutschmann, 12:51
- [ietf-dkim] HOWTO discuss things on this list..., Stephen Farrell, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", hector, 05:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Michael Deutschmann, 01:46
October 16, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", hector, 20:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", hector, 19:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Wietse Venema, 19:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, John Levine, 18:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Michael Deutschmann, 17:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Franck Martin, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, J.D. Falk, 14:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, J.D. Falk, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 13:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, John R. Levine, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 13:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Steve Atkins, 12:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", hector, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Ian Eiloart, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 10:31
- [ietf-dkim] Case for ADSP "dkim=except-mlist", Michael Deutschmann, 10:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Charles Lindsey, 07:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Charles Lindsey, 07:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 07:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 07:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 07:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 07:20
October 15, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 19:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Michael Thomas, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, J.D. Falk, 16:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, John Levine, 11:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Charles Lindsey, 07:46
- [ietf-dkim] Assessing Policy Vs Reputation Assertions, hector, 07:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Charles Lindsey, 07:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Daniel Black, 06:11
October 14, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 15:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Doug Otis, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Dave CROCKER, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Michael Thomas, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, J.D. Falk, 14:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Dave CROCKER, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 13:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Dave CROCKER, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 13:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, John Levine, 13:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Steve Atkins, 12:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Doug Otis, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 11:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 10:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Dave CROCKER, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, John R. Levine, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 08:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Ian Eiloart, 07:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Ian Eiloart, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, Ian Eiloart, 07:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] List Server ADSP Support, Ian Eiloart, 06:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Charles Lindsey, 06:17
October 13, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] List Server ADSP Support, hector, 19:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] brand protection, was Is anyone using ADSP?, John Levine, 19:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 17:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Dave CROCKER, 13:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Steve Atkins, 11:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Michael Thomas, 10:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Stephen Farrell, 07:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Ian Eiloart, 07:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, Charles Lindsey, 06:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mailing list argument, was Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Ian Eiloart, 06:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Ian Eiloart, 06:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 04:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 04:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 04:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Dave CROCKER, 03:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Steve Atkins, 02:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Franck Martin, 02:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, hector, 01:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mailing list argument, was Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 00:53
October 12, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, John R. Levine, 22:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mailing list argument, was Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), John Levine, 22:20
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: Deployment Guide Section 6.1/6.5 (ADSP/Forwader) conflict, hector, 21:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 21:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), J.D. Falk, 17:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 16:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Jim Fenton, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Doug Otis, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 12:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Charles Lindsey, 12:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Ian Eiloart, 12:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 11:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Wietse Venema, 10:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 03:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Daniel Black, 02:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 00:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 00:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, John Levine, 00:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 00:11
October 11, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the receiving side, Daniel Black, 23:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-01 posted - comments, Doug Otis, 22:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP?, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 22:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Scott Kitterman, 22:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Franck Martin, 21:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Scott Kitterman, 21:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 18:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Dave CROCKER, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 18:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP?, hector, 18:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 17:50
- [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP?, John Levine, 16:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 16:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 16:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Dave CROCKER, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 14:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Deutschmann, 06:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), 牛粥, 03:54
October 10, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Jim Fenton, 21:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 19:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 19:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Franck Martin, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Steve Atkins, 16:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), hector, 15:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 15:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), John Levine, 15:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 15:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Dave CROCKER, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), John Levine, 13:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Michael Thomas, 12:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), John Levine, 03:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Resigner Support of RFC 5617 (ADSP), Daniel Black, 01:31
October 07, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] draft-otis-dkim-tpa-label-00 posted, Douglas Otis, 22:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Franck Martin, 17:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, hector, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, hector, 17:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Doug Otis, 17:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Barry Leiba, 16:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", Barry Leiba, 16:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Doug Otis, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Daniel Black, 06:29
October 06, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Doug Otis, 18:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Michael Thomas, 18:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Franck Martin, 18:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Franck Martin, 18:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Michael Thomas, 17:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Bill.Oxley, 16:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, Doug Otis, 14:51
- [ietf-dkim] Third Party Signers and Authorization, hector, 13:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, John R. Levine, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Charles Lindsey, 13:01
October 05, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] The mystery of third party signatures, John Levine, 20:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, J.D. Falk, 18:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] third party signing, DKIM charter update proposal, Jim Fenton, 15:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Jim Fenton, 15:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] gathering data, Franck Martin, 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", Douglas Otis, 13:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", John Levine, 11:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 11:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", Dave CROCKER, 11:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] third party signing, DKIM charter update proposal, John Levine, 11:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 11:00
- [ietf-dkim] Third-party "authorization", Dave CROCKER, 10:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, MH Michael Hammer \(5304\), 10:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] gathering data, Barry Leiba, 10:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Barry Leiba, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] gathering data, Franck Martin, 08:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] gathering data, Stephen Farrell, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] gathering data (was: Re: DKIM charter update proposal), Franck Martin, 07:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Stephen Farrell, 06:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Stephen Farrell, 06:17
- [ietf-dkim] gathering data (was: Re: DKIM charter update proposal), Stephen Farrell, 06:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Stephen Farrell, 06:08
October 03, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Bill.Oxley, 21:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 20:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 17:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 08:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, hector, 08:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Franck Martin, 07:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Bill.Oxley, 03:03
October 01, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Franck Martin, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Steve Atkins, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, Franck Martin, 16:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal, J.D. Falk, 15:46