-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 11:19 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk; John R. Levine; Daniel Black; ietf-
dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the
receiving side
They won't honour ADSP "dkim=discardable" records posted by others.
So is it that they won't honor it as the sole criteria, or that they
won't pay any attention to it at all? I can understand the former,
but the later would be pretty weird since it's a pretty large hint
that something's really wrong.
I really don't want to be seen as speaking for Google based on two or three
sentences I exchanged with someone that works there.
So let me answer this way: My own inference from the conversation is that they
wouldn't discard/reject mail based on ADSP without a legal agreement to do so,
but it might be used as a hint to move such mail into a spam folder.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html