On 10/14/2009 09:44 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk
[mailto:iane(_at_)sussex(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2009 4:53 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy; John R. Levine; Daniel Black
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Is anyone using ADSP? - bit more data from the
receiving side
Another data point: Google Mail won't use ADSP because they will not
discard someone's mail outright without a written agreement from the
sending domain agreeing to same, absolving them of responsibility for
mail that never arrives.
You mean that they won't publish ADSP records? Or that they won't
respect
any ADSP records? Or that they won't discard "discardable" messages?
They won't honour ADSP "dkim=discardable" records posted by others.
So is it that they won't honor it as the sole criteria, or that they
won't pay any attention to it at all? I can understand the former,
but the later would be pretty weird since it's a pretty large hint
that something's really wrong.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html