On 10/11/2009 02:41 AM, Michael Deutschmann wrote:
On 10 Oct 2009, John Levine wrote:
People who contribute to mailing lists shouldn't say dkim=all. We
argued this ad nauseam when we were hammering out ADSP, it shouldn't
come as a surprise to anyone.
I'm an outsider delurking to say:
If this is indeed the official semantics of the protocol, then I would
petition to add a "dkim=except-mlist" policy. Which means "I sign
everything that leaves my bailiwick, but may post to signature-breaking
MLs."
No need. That is exactly what the semantics of "all" is.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html