I'd say just deprecate ADSP. It has a niche application if at all and
I dont foresee any kind of widespread deployment beyond in a few
senders / ESPs.
That kind of technology doesnt need an RFC for it.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:32 AM, hector
<gmail(_dot_)sant9442(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com> wrote:
John,
You can't use STATISTICS - you must use protocol methodology - LOGIC.
You can't tell the world RFC 5617 is available as a DKIM "Add-on"
technology YET support the intentional ignorance of its existence or
hope that no one will support it.
You can't have it both ways. Either you will support RFC 5617 or you,
as the author of RFC 5617 propose to get rid of it.
Either way, as a SMTP and LIST SERVER developer, it will at least give
us and in the general sense, all SMTP and LIST SERVER developers, a
protocol consistent methodology to increase DKIM adoption and unleash
it to our customers.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html