On 10/10/2009 12:33 PM, John Levine wrote:
It certainly doesn't help when one of the authors of the document
doesn't know what "all" means.
Maybe it would help if you tried paying more attention to reports
from people trying to implement this stuff. It's quite clear that
they desperately want DKIM+ADSP to be a magic spam filter, and so
they do silly things like treating all as approximately equivalent
to discardable.
If the document is unclear on this point, exactly whose fault is that?
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html