On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:45:21 +1200 (FJT) Franck Martin
<franck(_at_)genius(_dot_)com>
wrote:
----- "Scott Kitterman" <ietf-dkim(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> wrote:
Except that the ADSP RFC is already published and so it is what it is.
It is definitely
premature to crack ADSP open again (of course I thought that about
DKIM too).
But as ADSP states, that the problem of 3rd party signing is not covered,
and it seems the issue of mailing lists, then an addendum can be done.
The rough consensus of the group resulted in the ADSP we have now. These
issues were discussed before and until there's some reason to believe the
rough consensus has shifted, I think it's not the best use of my time.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html