----- "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org> wrote:
Ian Eiloart wrote:
That seems sensible to me. So lists should not forward email that
they're
about to render 'discardable' by breaking the signature. Instead,
they
should reject (5xx) or bounce (DSN) the message. Presumably, a bank
wants
to know if it has a bad email address for a customer.
Yep.
Of course, if you
aren't going to break the signature, or are rewriting the From:
address,
then it's OK to forward the email.
Probably.
if you are rewriting the from and put the original sender in the sender: field,
most MUA will display it like this:
Sent by JD Falk
on the behalf of DKIM-WG
Seems strange to me.
If you rewrite only the From: header then the MUA will display
from: DKIM-WG
then you hope there is a signature of some sort to know who sent the email
originally.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html