Hi Hector,
We need to keep the tone here under control and in particular
the text below is inappropriate. Please desist from making
assertions like this on this list.
hector wrote:
Well, maybe if the WG can get a true champion of POLICY and not one
that selfishly took over SSP with the sole clever confessing purpose
of creating a non-working protocol poison pill, then could change.
...
Your input is extremely bias and a conflict of interest to the WG
participants who have interest in seeing a POLICY system work.
And just to be clear, your blaming us as you say below, is not
a problem for me.
But you know, I don't blame you. I blame the CHAIRS for allowing this
to occur. It is surreal!
If you feel the need to discuss this further please do that
off-list with Barry & I.
Stephen.
Is that crazy or what?
This tells me that I'm not the only one who
thinks that there isn't a business case for ADSP.
Thats crazy!
--
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html