Eliot Lear wrote:
On 10/26/09 9:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
[ . . . ]
If we don't want to change this document so late in its evolution, that's
fine; I'd be happy if it came out as a BCP document later, either from the
IETF or through a body like MAAWG.
Separate BCP on details on usage: +1
[ . . . ]
+1, but a forward reference of some sort, like "a separate work is
planned on this topic" wouldn't be out of order.
+1 to both the BCP and the forward reference.
--
J.D. Falk
Return Path Inc
http://www.returnpath.net/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html