Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal

It occurs to me that there are a bunch of technical clarifications to
the spec that (I think) Tony wrote up after the connectathon a year or
so ago.  If we want to move to DS, would it be worth a pass over 4871
to incorporate them?  I don't think there have been any more recently,
so this would probably count as making it more mature.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html