Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I'd invite the people that have been involved in those conversations to state
specifically what areas draft-ietf-dkim-deployment could cover to close these
gaps.
I seek one thing:
Codify the semantics regarding ADSP implementation vs Forwarder DKIM
implementation.
If thats a problem, then ADSP needs to be pulled. We don't need
evidence to show there is a problem but only engineering inference
that there will be a problem if there is any growth in either part
with a clear collision.
--
HLS
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html