I do not see where is the issue? I 3rd party sign emails and I have not faced
any problems with that (Am I missing something?) The providers that check DKIM
all include a dkim=pass in the mail headers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Oxley" <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com>
To: barryleiba(_at_)computer(_dot_)org
Cc: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Sent: Saturday, 3 October, 2009 2:56:44 PM GMT +12:00 Fiji
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal
while I have enjoyed participasting in this WG I would like to
discuss the ability of an ISP to sign on behalf of an entity that we
provide all services for. This has generated disinclination in the
past but as a provider who has an expressed interest in providing 3rd
party signatures we need a set of rules/ideas that states I signed
this message on the behalf of foo.examplemy.client.com. Otherwise DKIM
is interesting as an artifact but I ill will be signing soon my
residential emails but have no interest in signing my commercial folks
unless there is a benefit
thanks,
Bill
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html