In light of the comments by Bill Oxley and my belief that the ability of
a domain to designate signing by a specified 3rd party is useful, I'd
like to see this included in the update. I believe this would be useful
for ISPs as well as ESPs. I don't have any specific wording or proposals
on this.
Michael Hammer - mhammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com
Web Operations Security
AG Interactive/americangreetings.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:44 AM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal
Folks,
To make life a little easier for us all, (well, mainly Barry
and I:-), could you please keep this thread to discussion of
the proposed charter update.
And where you've thoughts on that, specific alternate
text would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Stephen.
PS: I see John L. has done the right thing and changed
the subject line, maybe reply to that if that's what you
want to chat about.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html