-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Steve Atkins
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 10:42 AM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM charter update proposal
I'd be fine with doing that through this WG, although we have chosen
on several occasions not to take up that draft as a WG item.
Instead, it's now in the proposed charter for the ARF WG.
It's a DKIM thing. If it's going to be done, this group is the group
to do it.
Backdooring it through another group is, at best, not going to be as
effective I don't think.
I think it has non-trivial relevance to both groups, and I don't consider doing
it through ARF a sneaky move of any sort.
Since the WG has turned it down a few times now, are you suggesting it should
be an individual submission?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html