Re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dkim-reporting
I'd be fine with doing that through this WG, although we have chosen
on several occasions not to take up that draft as a WG item.
Instead, it's now in the proposed charter for the ARF WG.
It's a DKIM thing. If it's going to be done, this group is the group
to do it.
Backdooring it through another group is, at best, not going to be as
effective I don't think.
It's not a question of a "back door". This WG decided some time ago
that it was a good idea, but out of scope. As far as I can tell, that
hasn't changed, so it's still out of scope.
In any case, once it's a Proposed Standard, no one will care what
working group sent it through.
Barry, as chair
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html