On 10/23/2009 05:08 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Jim Fenton wrote:
Good question. I wasn't proposing that we judge usefulness at all; I
was responding to suggestions from others that measuring usefulness be
included in the charter.
Well, I can certainly understand producing documents that discuss efficacy
(and
maybe even how to achieve it) but I don't understand refraining from moving
specs to Draft.
First, do no harm.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html