On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:37:56 +0100, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
<MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com> wrote:
In light of the comments by Bill Oxley and my belief that the ability of
a domain to designate signing by a specified 3rd party is useful, I'd
like to see this included in the update. I believe this would be useful
for ISPs as well as ESPs. I don't have any specific wording or proposals
on this.
At item I would like to see is some clear guidance to mailing list
expanders (otherwise they are all going to do it differently). It may turn
out that there is no "one size fits all" solution, but I doubt that 57
different solutions would be needed either.
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html