+1
Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com wrote:
We still have couple of unprocessed errata for RFC 4871 left.
Let's try to handle an easy one first:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1385
To me it looks like Section 3.6.2.2 does already specify the
necessary details:
Strings in a TXT RR MUST be concatenated together before use with no
intervening whitespace. TXT RRs MUST be unique for a particular
selector name; that is, if there are multiple records in an RRset,
the results are undefined.
Thus, the errata appears unnecessary. Unless I hear objections within
a week or so, I'll mark this as "Rejected" (with a note pointing to
Section 3.6.2.2)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html