ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signatures, was Why mailing lists should strip them

2010-04-30 07:35:08
In article <4BDA70B5(_dot_)4090708(_at_)tana(_dot_)it> you write:
On 29/Apr/10 01:12, SM wrote:
The diversity
of the email environment is such that you cannot come up with a
"mellowed" canonicalization to cope with every possible change.

Yet, it would seem that by, say, hashing just invariants of binary 
representations of the first entity, e.g. discarding its white space 
and punctuation, one may reach very high percentages of unbroken 
retransmission.

It sounds like you want to experiment with different canon schemes for DKIM,
rather than the two that exist now.  Wouldn't that be more appropriate
for ASRG?

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>