Mark Delany wrote:
Steve Atkins:
I don't see how DKIM can provide the obverse - the obvious way
is for a sender to assert that all their mail has a DKIM signature,
but that fails when the DKIM signature breaks in transit. Is there
a clever trick I'm missing?
So you're saying it can provide the obverse; you just don't like the
failure modes. Perhaps surprisingly, the failure modes are exactly
what attracts some folk to DKIM.
+1
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html