Rolf E. Sonneveld wrote:
Although DKIM does not specify (as far as I know) what to do with DKIM
signatures in inner bodyparts, I think DKIM signatures should never be
removed without a good reason.
If you believe this, then you have to advocate the removal of the RFC
4871 mandate regarding invalid signatures changing to no-signature
status as if it never existed and the message was never signed.
What this means is that if a MLM keeps broken tracings of signatures,
the only existing trace signature is the valid one. All others must
be ignored.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html