-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org [mailto:ietf-dkim-
bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Jeff Macdonald
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 11:23 AM
To: DKIM WG
Subject: [ietf-dkim] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-00
The proposal Dave and I did, "Affiliated Names List"*, was a way for a
domain owner to publish affiliations with other DKIM domains. My
motivation for that proposal was driven by the belief** that 3rd party
signatures, which I will now call Non-Author DKIM Signatures, would be
treated differently than 1st party signatures.
That remains an unknown. I still haven't figured out what policy should be
exposed to verifiers when ATPS hits but ADSP doesn't.
If there is a consensus that Non-Author DKIM Signatures should be
scored negatively***, then I suggest the scope of this document could
be expanded by simply removing the requirement that there be an ADSP
tag present. This would allow domain owners who are not participating
in ADSP to use the same infrastructure that this draft puts in place.
Sure, it's possible consensus will go in the direction of supplanting ADSP with
this. It certainly could (and I actually hadn't even thought of that until
now). If that's the case it won't be hard to detach it from ADSP altogether.
PS - I apologize if this draft isn't within our charter.
I suggest we discuss it on dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org(_dot_) It's active
on dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org, but I think that's also the wrong place
for it as it's not an operational concern (yet).
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html