On 10/11/2010 11:46 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
Dave:
There's an error in the new paragraph in section 5.3; the first
sentence appears to have been fragmented. It reads thus: "Similarly,
a message that is not compliant with RFC5322, RFC2045 correct or
interpret such content."
Please post the correct version here, so reviewers have it handy, and
have it ready for any subsequent update.
Oh boy. Very sorry folks.
The full text reads:
<t>Similarly, a message not compliant with RFC5322, RFC2045 and
RFC2047, can be subject to attempts by intermediaries to
correct
or interpret such content. See the Section 8 of [SUBMISSION]
for
examples of changes that are commonly made. Such "corrections"
may break DKIM signatures or have other undesirable effects.
Therefore, a DKIM agent SHOULD confirm that a message is
compliant with those specifications prior to processing. </t>
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html