IETF DKIM (date)
October 26, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), John R. Levine, 20:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), John R. Levine, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Steve Atkins, 13:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Hector Santos, 11:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Steve Atkins, 11:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Ian Eiloart, 06:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Hector Santos, 06:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Alessandro Vesely, 05:01
- [ietf-dkim] Take Three - Section 8.14, Hector Santos, 04:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Hector Santos, 03:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Conspicuously absent statistics, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:37
- [ietf-dkim] Take two (was Re: Proposal for new text about multiple header issues), Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:00
October 25, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 20:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, John R. Levine, 19:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Douglas Otis, 17:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Douglas Otis, 17:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Douglas Otis, 17:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 16:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, Hector Santos, 16:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, John R. Levine, 14:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Michael Thomas, 14:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Steve Atkins, 14:03
- [ietf-dkim] Conspicuously absent statistics, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, Steve Atkins, 13:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, Dave CROCKER, 13:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, Eliot Lear, 13:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 11:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Dave CROCKER, 10:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Ian Eiloart, 10:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] wildcards, was Focusing on 4871bis, John R. Levine, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, John R. Levine, 10:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Dave CROCKER, 09:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, John Levine, 09:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, John Levine, 09:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 09:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 07:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Ian Eiloart, 05:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Ian Eiloart, 05:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Alessandro Vesely, 04:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Hector Santos, 00:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 00:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 00:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Dave CROCKER, 00:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Mark Delany, 00:00
October 24, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Steve Atkins, 23:58
- [ietf-dkim] Statistics about DKIM and MIME, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, John Levine, 23:26
- [ietf-dkim] Proposal for new text about multiple header issues, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Hector Santos, 16:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Dave CROCKER, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Hector Santos, 04:17
October 22, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, Hector Santos, 21:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] the usual misunderstanding about what DKIM promises, John Levine, 20:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02, John Levine, 20:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Mark Delany, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, John R. Levine, 17:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, SM, 16:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Steve Atkins, 14:57
- [ietf-dkim] Multiple occurrences of header fields, Bill.Oxley, 14:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Hector Santos, 14:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Dave CROCKER, 11:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 11:08
- [ietf-dkim] Focusing on 4871bis, Barry Leiba, 10:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Dave CROCKER, 09:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNA, Barry Leiba, 09:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Ian Eiloart, 06:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] IDNA, John R. Levine, 00:07
October 21, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Dave CROCKER, 23:44
- [ietf-dkim] Commments and clarifications to 4871bis-02, John R. Levine, 23:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, SM, 23:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, John R. Levine, 23:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Dave CROCKER, 22:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Dave CROCKER, 20:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, John R. Levine, 20:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, John R. Levine, 15:00
- [ietf-dkim] FIX THE (DOC) PROBLEM!, Hector Santos, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Dave CROCKER, 14:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, J.D. Falk, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations, J.D. Falk, 14:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations, Hector Santos, 14:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations, Steve Atkins, 12:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 11:33
- [ietf-dkim] More on layer violations, John R. Levine, 11:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt, J.D. Falk, 10:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 06:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 06:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 05:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Mark Delany, 01:03
October 20, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Murray S. Kucherawy, 23:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Steve Atkins, 21:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Scott Kitterman, 20:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Michael Thomas, 19:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, John R. Levine, 19:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Steve Atkins, 18:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Douglas Otis, 18:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 17:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Douglas Otis, 17:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, John R. Levine, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Michael Thomas, 16:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?, Hector Santos, 16:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 16:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?, John R. Levine, 15:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Hector Santos, 15:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 12:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what do do with a signature, was detecting, Ian Eiloart, 11:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 11:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 11:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what do do with a signature, was detecting, John R. Levine, 10:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 10:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Charles Lindsey, 10:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Protecting messages, not MUAs, MTAs, or anything else, Charles Lindsey, 10:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 09:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Mark Delany, 07:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Charles Lindsey, 06:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 06:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, SM, 04:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?, Hector Santos, 00:21
October 19, 2010
- [ietf-dkim] What shows up with duplicated headers?, John R. Levine, 22:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Hector Santos, 20:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Douglas Otis, 20:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Hector Santos, 20:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Mark Delany, 19:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 17:30
- [ietf-dkim] double header reality check, John R. Levine, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Bill.Oxley, 16:42
- [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, SM, 16:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 15:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 15:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] who does reputation, was detecting header mutations, John R. Levine, 10:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 10:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 09:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 08:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 07:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Ian Eiloart, 05:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 05:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 05:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Protecting messages, not MUAs, MTAs, or anything else, Ian Eiloart, 05:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 05:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Alessandro Vesely, 02:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 01:14
October 18, 2010
- [ietf-dkim] FYI: TXT Record setup resolved by Domain Hosting Provider, Hector Santos, 22:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John Levine, 21:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Douglas Otis, 20:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Steve Atkins, 20:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John Levine, 19:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Protecting messages, not MUAs, MTAs, or anything else, Hector Santos, 19:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 19:27
- [ietf-dkim] Invalid RFC5322 related DKIM Implementation requirements, Hector Santos, 19:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Protecting messages, not MUAs, MTAs, or anything else, John R. Levine, 19:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Douglas Otis, 17:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 15:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Hector Santos, 15:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:23
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Component Responsibility, Hector Santos, 15:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Hector Santos, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Douglas Otis, 14:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Scott Kitterman, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Dave CROCKER, 13:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:19
- [ietf-dkim] Protecting MUAs, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Wietse Venema, 13:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and patents, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Mark Delany, 11:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail, Hector Santos, 09:27
- [ietf-dkim] How MUAs render mail (was: Data integrity claims), Wietse Venema, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 08:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 08:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 08:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 08:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement, Hector Santos, 07:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 07:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 07:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement, Charles Lindsey, 07:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 06:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 06:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 06:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 05:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] yet more sophistry, was Data integrity claims, Alessandro Vesely, 04:45
October 16, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Douglas Otis, 18:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] yet more sophistry, was Data integrity claims, John R. Levine, 14:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Michael Thomas, 14:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Scott Kitterman, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Dave CROCKER, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 11:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 10:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt, Alessandro Vesely, 10:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, Dave CROCKER, 09:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] sophistry is bad, was Data integrity claims, John R. Levine, 09:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Dave CROCKER, 09:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and patents, John Levine, 09:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Mark Delany, 01:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and patents, Mark Delany, 01:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, SM, 01:16
October 15, 2010
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement, Hector Santos, 23:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Dave CROCKER, 23:12
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM and patents, Franck Martin, 22:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Steve Atkins, 22:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 22:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 21:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Steve Atkins, 21:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, John Levine, 21:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Hector Santos, 20:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Mark Delany, 19:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Scott Kitterman, 19:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 18:59
- [ietf-dkim] Data integrity claims, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Bill.Oxley, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 18:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Stephen Farrell, 17:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 17:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Douglas Otis, 16:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 16:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, Douglas Otis, 16:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 16:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Steve Atkins, 16:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 15:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Bill.Oxley, 15:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Jeff Macdonald, 14:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Dave CROCKER, 14:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Dave CROCKER, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Hector Santos, 14:24
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 14:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, SM, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Dave CROCKER, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Scott Kitterman, 14:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Michael Thomas, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Steve Atkins, 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Michael Thomas, 13:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-04.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Stephen Farrell, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Dave CROCKER, 13:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Mark Delany, 13:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Bill.Oxley, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Alessandro Vesely, 13:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Hector Santos, 13:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Barry Leiba, 13:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Barry Leiba, 12:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 12:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Michael Thomas, 12:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 12:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 12:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Hector Santos, 12:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Steve Atkins, 12:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with SPF TXT records, Hector Santos, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Michael Thomas, 12:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Alessandro Vesely, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 10:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 10:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Ian Eiloart, 10:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Dave CROCKER, 10:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 10:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, John Levine, 10:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Jeff Macdonald, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Scott Kitterman, 09:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 09:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 08:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 08:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 08:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 08:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 08:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 05:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 04:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 04:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Alessandro Vesely, 04:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 04:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 03:57
- [ietf-dkim] Getting the word out (was: Last call comment: Changing the g= definition), SM, 00:07
October 14, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Tony Hansen, 20:45
- [ietf-dkim] 2 Day Collection Stats, Hector Santos, 19:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Steve Atkins, 19:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, John R. Levine, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Jim Fenton, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Dave CROCKER, 17:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, John R. Levine, 17:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Tony Hansen, 17:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, J.D. Falk, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, J.D. Falk, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 14:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 14:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 14:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Scott Kitterman, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Michael Thomas, 14:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Barry Leiba, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, Barry Leiba, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Barry Leiba, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Barry Leiba, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 13:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 13:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 13:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 13:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Jim Fenton, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Alessandro Vesely, 12:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Alessandro Vesely, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 12:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 11:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 11:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Bill.Oxley, 11:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 10:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 09:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 09:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 09:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Dave CROCKER, 09:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Jeff Macdonald, 09:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, John R. Levine, 08:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Mark Delany, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Dave CROCKER, 08:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Hector Santos, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Tony Hansen, 08:12
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM support in MUAs, Martijn Grooten, 08:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Dave CROCKER, 07:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Dave CROCKER, 07:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, Dave CROCKER, 07:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Graham Murray, 05:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 00:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?, Tony Hansen, 00:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 00:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, SM, 00:02
October 13, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] "550 5.7.0 bad DKIM signature data", SM, 23:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Jim Fenton, 22:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 22:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 22:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 22:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Scott Kitterman, 22:00
- [ietf-dkim] "550 5.7.0 bad DKIM signature data", Steve Atkins, 20:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 20:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 19:58
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records, Hector Santos, 19:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collected data, Hector Santos, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, SM, 18:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 18:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 17:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 17:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 17:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 17:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Steve Atkins, 17:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 17:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 17:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John Levine, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 16:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Barry Leiba, 16:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Jeff Macdonald, 15:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Michael Thomas, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Jeff Macdonald, 15:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Michael Thomas, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Jeff Macdonald, 14:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Scott Kitterman, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Scott Kitterman, 14:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 14:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Jeff Macdonald, 14:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Steve Atkins, 13:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 13:54
- [ietf-dkim] What DKIM provides, again, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Steve Atkins, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 13:41
- [ietf-dkim] rfc4871bis-02 version with diffs, Dave CROCKER, 13:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Jeff Macdonald, 13:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Scott Kitterman, 13:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Dave CROCKER, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Policy interop data, Hector Santos, 13:21
- [ietf-dkim] Policy interop data, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Jeff Macdonald, 13:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collected data, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 12:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Charles Lindsey, 12:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Charles Lindsey, 12:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Charles Lindsey, 12:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Example of DKIM bypasses RFC5322 Checking, Barry Leiba, 12:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 12:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition, Barry Leiba, 11:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 11:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Steve Atkins, 11:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 11:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, John Levine, 10:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, John Levine, 09:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02, Jeff Macdonald, 09:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Example of DKIM bypasses RFC5322 Checking, Ian Eiloart, 04:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Collected data, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:36
- [ietf-dkim] Collected data, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Dave CROCKER, 00:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:04
October 12, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 23:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 22:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 20:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Jim Fenton, 19:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Douglas Otis, 17:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Scott Kitterman, 16:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 14:33
- [ietf-dkim] FW: An issue with DKIM reporting extensions, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Dave CROCKER, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Jim Fenton, 12:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 12:23
- [ietf-dkim] Example of DKIM bypasses RFC5322 Checking, Hector Santos, 12:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Barry Leiba, 10:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Ian Eiloart, 10:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 08:41
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis-02 - Section 8.14 comments, Hector Santos, 08:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Dave CROCKER, 08:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Barry Leiba, 01:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Bill.Oxley, 00:53
October 11, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 20:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Douglas Otis, 18:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-03.txt, Stephen Farrell, 17:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 17:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-03.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Dave CROCKER, 16:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-03.txt, Jim Fenton, 16:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Jim Fenton, 16:22
- [ietf-dkim] More interesting data, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:02
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 14:34
- [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 13:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-02.txt, Dave CROCKER, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 08:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Ian Eiloart, 05:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Charles Lindsey, 04:40
October 09, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 14:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Inadvertent Spoof, Hector Santos, 11:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 11:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Inadvertent Spoof, Jeff Macdonald, 10:28
October 08, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 22:24
- [ietf-dkim] Inadvertent Spoof, Hector Santos, 18:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Jeff Macdonald, 17:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 16:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Steve Atkins, 16:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 16:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 15:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 14:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 14:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 13:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Scott Kitterman, 13:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 12:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Scott Kitterman, 12:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 12:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Dave CROCKER, 11:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Alessandro Vesely, 10:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 10:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Hector Santos, 09:54
- [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 09:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Wietse Venema, 06:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John Levine, 01:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Mark Delany, 00:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 00:03
October 07, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, Michael Thomas, 19:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] detecting header mutations after signing, John R. Levine, 19:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Dave CROCKER, 18:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Dave CROCKER, 18:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, SM, 18:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, SM, 15:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 14:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Michael Thomas, 13:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 12:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Michael Thomas, 11:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 06:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Charles Lindsey, 06:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 05:52
- [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Re: THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 05:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Charles Lindsey, 05:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Michael Deutschmann, 03:07
October 06, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Tony Hansen, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 14:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Steve Atkins, 14:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Scott Kitterman, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, J.D. Falk, 13:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis, Jim Fenton, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] signing and verifying invalid messages, J.D. Falk, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Jeff Macdonald, 10:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Dave CROCKER, 09:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Mark Delany, 08:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, John R. Levine, 08:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Dave CROCKER, 08:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Dave CROCKER, 08:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Steve Atkins, 07:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Wietse Venema, 07:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Alessandro Vesely, 07:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 07:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Charles Lindsey, 07:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Charles Lindsey, 06:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Charles Lindsey, 05:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis, SM, 03:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 02:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 01:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Mark Delany, 00:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, SM, 00:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:25
October 05, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Mark Delany, 23:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Dave CROCKER, 21:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 19:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Stephen Farrell, 19:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 19:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 19:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Julian Mehnle, 19:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Julian Mehnle, 18:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Hector Santos, 18:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, Julian Mehnle, 17:56
- [ietf-dkim] THIS IS A MULTIPLE 5322.FROM MESSAGE, President Obama, 17:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, SM, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Scott Kitterman, 16:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] signing and verifying invalid messages, Hector Santos, 16:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Julian Mehnle, 16:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] signing and verifying invalid messages, Michael Thomas, 15:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] signing and verifying invalid messages, John Levine, 15:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 15:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, John Levine, 15:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, John Levine, 15:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Scott Kitterman, 15:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Jeff Macdonald, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Julian Mehnle, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Julian Mehnle, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Douglas Otis, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 10:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 10:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Julian Mehnle, 10:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 09:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 09:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 09:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 08:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Hector Santos, 07:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Bill.Oxley, 07:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Dave CROCKER, 07:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Ian Eiloart, 07:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Ian Eiloart, 07:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Ian Eiloart, 07:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 06:52
October 04, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Bill.Oxley, 23:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Hector Santos, 22:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Hector Santos, 21:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Murray S. Kucherawy, 21:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 21:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Bill.Oxley, 21:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, J.D. Falk, 19:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Michael Thomas, 17:36
- [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 4871bis - Security Loop hole with Multiple 5322.From, Hector Santos, 17:26
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics, Hector Santos, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt, Hector Santos, 16:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 16:22
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-mailinglists-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 16:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, John R. Levine, 16:09
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 16:02
- [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report, Barry Leiba, 15:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, McCann Peter-A001034, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Douglas Otis, 11:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DSN with signature "replay", Hector Santos, 10:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DSN with signature "replay", Hector Santos, 10:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Jeff Macdonald, 10:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DSN with signature "replay", Sonneveld, Rolf, 09:51
- [ietf-dkim] DSN with signature "replay", Hector Santos, 09:40
- [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis, Barry Leiba, 07:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Charles Lindsey, 06:58
October 03, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM Message Handling Rules, Douglas Otis, 11:32
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM Message Handling Rules, Hector Santos, 10:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, John R. Levine, 09:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Douglas Otis, 09:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Michael Deutschmann, 02:26
October 02, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-01.txt, John R. Levine, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 11:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Stephen Farrell, 10:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Dave CROCKER, 10:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Barry Leiba, 09:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Stephen Farrell, 08:41
October 01, 2010
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, John R. Levine, 22:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Hector Santos, 19:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, SM, 18:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Dave CROCKER, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Douglas Otis, 16:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 16:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, McCann Peter-A001034, 16:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 16:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Jeff Macdonald, 15:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ASL/ATPS Zone Record Wizard and Policy Simulator, Hector Santos, 13:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Dave CROCKER, 13:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Hector Santos, 12:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Dave CROCKER, 12:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Dave CROCKER, 12:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-01.txt, Dave CROCKER, 12:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Dave CROCKER, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 11:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Hector Santos, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Dave CROCKER, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Dave CROCKER, 11:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Michael Thomas, 11:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Michael Thomas, 11:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Steve Atkins, 10:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Jeff Macdonald, 10:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Corner cases and loose ends, was , draft-vesely-dkim-joint-sigs, Jeff Macdonald, 09:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Updated implementation report, Jeff Macdonald, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Comments on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:51