On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:06:14 +0100, Murray S. Kucherawy
<msk(_at_)cloudmark(_dot_)com> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 7:14 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] ISSUE: 3.6.2.1 - Working with other TXT records
By the way, has everyone tested their signing code to see what happens
if there's no From: header at all? Do we even agree what the right
thing is? I'd think it'd be approximately the same as if the private
signing key (the only other mandatory input I can think of at the
moment) wasn't present.
OpenDKIM returns a syntax error in both cases.
And to complete the picture, what does it do when verifying?
--
Charles H. Lindsey ---------At Home, doing my own thing------------------------
Tel: +44 161 436 6131
Web: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~chl
Email: chl(_at_)clerew(_dot_)man(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave, CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K.
PGP: 2C15F1A9 Fingerprint: 73 6D C2 51 93 A0 01 E7 65 E8 64 7E 14 A4 AB A5
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html