Charles, I was showing what already is written and suggesting that it
might need clarification.
Charles Lindsey wrote:
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:09:53 +0100, Hector Santos
<hsantos(_at_)isdg(_dot_)net> wrote:
This probably means that it should clarified what that 5.4 sentence
means and also the next section 5.5
5.5. Recommended Signature Content
..
The following header fields SHOULD be included in the signature, if
they are present in the message being signed:
o From (REQUIRED in all signatures)
But that is weaker what what it already says, which implies saying
"h=from" even if NO from is (contrary t0 5322) present.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html