On 10/14/10 6:54 AM, John R. Levine wrote:
Another potential option is to remove g= entirely:
I'd like to encourage our considering this strongly, for two reasons:
I agree, g= seems to me to be a vestige of the confusion between i=
and d= identity.
If we do, it's probably a good idea to put in Tony's WARNING for
people upgrading from DK.
+1
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html