-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave CROCKER
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:08 AM
To: IETF DKIM WG
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] removing the g= definition?
On 10/14/2010 12:46 AM, Tony Hansen wrote:
Another potential option is to remove g= entirely:
I'd like to encourage our considering this strongly, for two reasons:
[...]
I'd support this. Our statistics show that its use other than "g=*" or "g="
with DK back-compatibility is vanishingly small (when I looked last night, 7
out of 300,000 keys retrieved made use of it by actually naming something
there).
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html