Re: [ietf-dkim] Last call comment: Changing the g= definition

At 13:03 13-10-10, Barry Leiba wrote:
>       To avoid second-guessing in a security context, and because
>       DomainKeys is an obsolete protocol, DKIM verifiers MUST
>       interpret this situation in DKIM terms, matching only
>       empty "i=" values.
Changing the g= definition takes advancement of the base DKIM 
protocol off the table.

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html