-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Murray S.
Kucherawy
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 10:04 AM
To: DKIM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations
after signing
And since we're all insisting MUA developer and user inertia is here to
stay, then even all the fixes we're talking about aren't going to make
the enforcement of header field counts visible to end users; the sum
and substance of the impact will be that the Authentication-Results
header field (or other annotation) will change from "fail" to "pass",
but this is rarely rendered to end users, and so the problem remains.
That should be "pass" to "fail", of course.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html