ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing

2010-10-14 12:59:49
Not only do I want that, I did that.  But the DKIM/ADSP module of that 
system is purely DKIM/ADSP.  The module that sits between the MTA and 
the DKIM/ADSP module does the header count enforcement we're talking about, 
knowing there's the potential for invalid mush in there.

Well, now we're back to my question to Dave, what's the advantage of 
leaving that as folklore rather than putting it in the spec other than the 
warm theological feeling of somewhat preserving layer distinctions, except 
for all the places we already didn't?

We're still not talking about changing the bits on the wire, nor of the 
handling of any valid 5322 message.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)iecc(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet 
for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. http://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>