ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] layer violations, was detecting header mutations after signing

2010-10-15 03:57:54


--On 14 October 2010 09:27:35 -0700 Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> 
wrote:

Unless there's *really* something they can't figure out without protocol
help, I'm not sure what the point of this is. This double added From thing
is trivial to detect with the current spec.

Well, it took us a few years to spot the problem, and that's because some 
MUA exhibits it. Surely a little guidance wouldn't go amiss?


-- 
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>